Uh, how is he spinning it that way?

Senator Dianne Feinstein brought it up, just not by name. All Jay did was call attention to the implied cover she was using, showing that it was being misused. That's hardly anti-feminist sentiment. Too often alleged feminists have had the message "Feminism is the belief that women are people." with the message that somehow men are sub-human. Equality isn't a problem, it's the trade of one inequality for another inequality and trying to pass it off as progress that is the problem.

Had it been the opposite, there would have been howls, and rightly so. But the double standard is alive and well here, hence the question. I've not heard those opposed to something point out the hypocrisy, even with those words. What I have heard is people who point out the hypocrisy get painted as opposing things. How dare they criticize the approach! They must be evil and in opposition to everything good! Which is, of course, complete and utter nonsense.

So, because to some it's a relatively minor thing, it should just be ignored? Ignoring a small problem only lets it fester and grow into a bigger problem. And while that happens, credibility is eroded.

Rather than talking to me as a son, a husband, a father – which I specifically requested that he do.

Perhaps it would better to say, "one of" but I don't know what Jay had as a source.

As far as Roberts goes, he's been avoiding obvious traps -- from Democrats and Republicans -- where there are emotional issues posed rather than legal ones. I see more fear of the unknown as he isn't following in a pre-ordained path they like more than anything else.