Jay Maynard (jmaynard) wrote,
Jay Maynard
jmaynard

  • Mood:

Buildup to war

We're about to get off our collective butts and do what we should have done last November: go in and remove Saddam from power. It's long past time for the UN Security Council to stand up and say it's willing to back up its words with force; since it won't, we're going to do the job ourselves.

The French and the antiwar apologists such as wbwolf argue that inspections should be allowed to run their course, claiming they are working. The only reason they're working at all is that Saddam is using them to delay the war; by backing this argument, the French are helping him stay in power. If we back off now, we'll discover that the inspections have quit working - and, in the meantime, Saddam will have succeeded in his objective to delay the war into the summer. This would cause even more casualties than fighting now will.

Yes, we risk an environmental disaster, as well as casualties among innocent Iraqis (though I question whether there are any such; by not rising up and throwing Saddam out, it can be argued they brought it on themselves). The blame for those can be laid squarely at Saddam's feet. If he'd disarmed, as he agreed to in 1991, none of this would be necessary. We cannot let more of his potential crimes against his own people and the environment to dissuade us from doing what must be done. If we do, he wins.

As for following the rule of international law, it's broken down. Any law must back up its pronouncements with effective means of enforcement. There are no such means here, as the UN has plainly refused to put teeth into its 17 resolutions on the subject.

I'd have posted this to wbwolf's LJ as a comment, but he's too busy preaching to the choir to hear dissent.
Subscribe

  • Someone should print this poster

    In case you can't read it, it says: VINDICATION: When the loudest critic of your policies achieves his greatest success because of them. (hat…

  • Took him long enough...

    So, President Obama finally released his birth certificate. Now we can put the matter to rest. Personally, I've always thought that whether he was…

  • Fun fact for the day

    1337% of pi is 42.

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments